Condolence and Caution - A Secular Response to the Tragedy at Virginia Tech

Submitted by AmandaMetskas on Sun, 2007-04-22 16:52.

This article originally appeared in the SSA eMpirical No. 18 - It's Spring, We Think

 By Amanda K. Metskas

Burruss Hall at VTWe at the Secular Student Alliance are deeply saddened by the events at Virginia Tech on Monday.  We received an email asking for a secular perspective on what happened, and given our mission to serve students and student communities, we think it is important to offer our response.

In the face of such senseless and random violence, it is hard to feel anything but shock, pain, and fear.  It’s hard to have anything to say.  For many touched by this crime, the solace they gain in their religious communities provides some measure of comfort in their time of need.  For those of us who are secular, we seek solace, comfort, and community from our friends and family.  Our thoughts are with those who were affected by these terrible events, and our hearts reach out to them.

As we offer our condolences and compassion, we are also concerned by some of the media coverage this event has generated, and some of the responses it has provoked.  Hemant Mehta, the Chair of the Secular Student Alliance’s Board of Directors, has pointed out some of the more egregious examples of the “blame game” on his blog.

What concerns us, however, is more than just these shrill voices; it is the wall-to-wall coverage that sensationalizes this tragedy, and in a perverse way seems to glorify the criminal.  It is a perfectly natural human reaction to seek explanations for events like this – we want to understand why this happened so that our world makes sense and we can feel safe again.  It is this reaction that leads to non-stop updates about the killer, mountains of ad hoc armchair speculation about causes, and extreme claims about policy implications.

It’s difficult for us to keep an event like this in perspective.  It is so emotionally wrenching that it is easy to overreact.  The Virginia Tech killings hit us where it hurts because they are so random, senseless, and unexpected.  They shatter our feeling of safety as we go about our lives, because if a college classroom isn’t safe, is any place?  It’s difficult to step back from that feeling and remember that this event is receiving so much attention, and is so scary to us, precisely because it is extremely rare.  We don’t react in this same way when someone is killed in an automobile accident, because that is so commonplace.  It happens everyday.  In fact, it happens to an average of 107 people each day in the United States.*  We don’t react in the same way when we hear about casualties in Iraq either, because it’s a war zone.  We are used to the idea that people are killed in war, and as terrible as that is, we’ve come to expect it.

As tough as it may be, we need to resist the temptation to enact knee-jerk policies based on our emotional reaction to this tragedy.  We need to be careful not to let media coverage of rare and tragic events like these lead us to be afraid of the wrong things, as Barry Glassner explains in his book Culture of Fear.

None of this is intended to diminish the grief felt by those touched by the tragedy at Virginia Tech, and none of this is intended to diminish the compassion that we feel for them.  Sometimes senseless tragedy befalls us, and we don’t have a good systematic explanation.  Sometimes when this happens the only thing that makes sense to do is console those who suffer, and help the best we can.

 

*This statistic was generated by dividing the 39,189 motor vehicle accident fatalities reported here for 2005 by 365 days in the year.

 Amanda K. Metskas is President of Camp Quest, Inc., a secular summer camp.  She is also a member of the Secular Student Alliance, and a past contributor to the eMpirical.  She is married to August E. Brunsman IV, the SSA's Executive Director.  Their essay about Camp Quest appears in Parenting Beyond Belief, a remarkable new book on secular parenting.

This article originally appeared in the SSA eMpirical No. 18 - It's Spring, We Think.  

( categories: Articles | Dangerous Ideas | Internal | News )
Submitted by freyaeire on Fri, 2007-04-20 11:45.

As a former student with three degrees from VT, which is a ten minute drive from my home, this tragedy really numbed me to the core. Watching all of the media coverage was informative, but also extremely painful, as they truly did glamorize the incident with words like "massacre" and as they sought to stir controversy and condemn our local leaders. I was telling my friends how at times like this I almost wish I had a belief system in which to bury my fears, but ultimately, I know I can only have faith in my fellow man. Your article perfectly expresses my thoughts and feelings, and I feel so fortunate to have accessed your words this morning. Thank you for providing a wonderful secular perspective.

Submitted by Heine_Wick on Sat, 2007-04-21 05:50.

There have been many tragedies at as many schools which involved a "deranged" killer pumping bullets into people he was associated with. The fact of this is not new, of course; but there will be many more. I have no basis upon which to propose a theory about such senseless, stupid acts of terrible violence: I think that this is something that those of us who choose to be absent from any protests, movements, or whatever affiliations such groups of well-minded peoples may be given, will come to accept as as necessary a part of life as are airplane crashes and automobile deaths. The fear stirred by actions ought to, I think, be correlative with the likelihood that such a fate might meet some person.

Insofar as this is a reply to the previous poster, subjects not dealt with explicitly in both my post and his/hers should not be considered to be related in a statement-reply way.

I was very nearly killed in a senseless -- or one of whatever sense the attacker might attach to his actions -- knife attack. The scar -- the most notable one, on my neck -- seems like a badge of courage to some, once I've told them what happened; but it appears to me to be in many people's eyes a "Red Badge Of Courage," a mark of "sin" (as I think many people who see it believe it to be with sincerity) or deviation from the pack of wild beasts, or some weakness. However, I had nothing at all to do with it, with the cutting up of my flesh, and in this way I was vaguely similar to what befell those students and faculty (if any) who were injured but not killed in the massacre -- I use the word as it has been used for many generations, to mean the killing (murder) of a large number of persons in one place and time. Forty people killed is the subjective standard I have held in my mind for some time. The number, "32 + (1 or 0)", doesn't seem to affect the application of the term to what "happened" at Virginia Tech -- the passive voice ought to be witheld from use concerning the willful perpetrators of crimes, especially those involving murder, once the perpetrator has been found guilty in a just trial. Society must be held together until the next overthrow of its (system of) government -- and in that case the overthrow probably ought not to have happened in the first place, as the consequences have been mostly bloody and evil.

Sensationalism is a hallmark of the television medium, of the networks who purvey what is newsworthy. This is, of course, largely merely what things written, or photgraphed, will be expected to make money. That's capitalism; but the system of lack of restrictions that accompanies ours permits the profligation of alternative news sources. To say that, in such a situation, the "media" are government-controlled lackeys, reflects only upon the characteristics of the "controlled" population. That is a personal reflection, and is not pertinent to the article here.

Fear of such random attacks as those that were perpetrated, with multiple fatalities and other casualties, is something that doesn't affect me in any degree greater than that merited by an increased vigilance -- proportional to the objective statistical risk in one's locale, which one never knows accurately -- that might decrease the personal risk of the one concerned without negating and exceeding its benefits, the benefits of such things, for example, as riding a bicycle only when wearing a bike helmet, or swimming in a pool or lake with supervision,regardless of one's age (in both cases). Further fear, in the face of something terrible that can not be prevented effectively by any general means, is personal indulgence in participation in the power structure which governs our lives to a large degree.